Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laizen Comics
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 05:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Laizen Comics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The company is not notable; there are no awards received, no dedicated coverage in the media beyond passing mention. The company fails to satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Binksternet (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - The article indicates (and Lone Star Comics listings confirm) that this company has only published a single comic book, Dreamhoppers. So even if Dreamhoppers were deemed notable, that would be a justification for an article on Dreamhoppers, not on the publisher.--NukeofEarl (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.